Happy new bans
By Frédéric Meurin on Wednesday 3 January 2007, 12:05 - On the web - Permalink
On this early 2007, some things are going to change out here in France for PEZ...
"Happy new year", said IdfTrotter, "what about some bans ?"
The question was a long time one, but this time it's going for real. Before we detailled them, let's explain why some bans have to occur.
Because PEZ is intended as both a cheap AND fun format. The Affinity / Mono-Black / UB Tendrils domination currently leaves no room for any other deck, and these 3 fight each other as this : UB beats Affinity beats MB beats UB.
Some other decks are trying to show up (Life, IsoMUC), but can't really exist before a good opening hand of any of these three.
So, in order to "break" these decks, without making them unplayable, IdfTrotter suggested to ban some essential cards to them. You may be find these choices irrelevant, stupid or whatever, but they have been long debated, and if you know your Magic well, you should notice these are already ban in Legacy AND restricted in Vintage. So to say they're overpowered.
So let's strip PEZ of the mine...
Mono-Black heavily abuses Strip mine. First it was a common, but the Peasant Council over-rated it as an unco. Unfortunately, any game with 4 Strip Mine and 4 Sinkhole is an auto win. And actually, the card's so good it has been seen in IsoBurn, leaving the Isochron Scepter as a sided fifth unco !
Cool down, don't be so Frantic
UB Tendrils, and in a lesser proportion, ProsTides, relies on Frantic Search. We first tought the problem was High tide, but it's not. You can run a UB Tendrils without it but with Frantic Search untapping again and again a Dimir Aqueduct. Drawing 2, discarding 2 AND untapping 3 lands, at instant speed... definitely was too much.
End of Capitalism and Animal Research
Remember the "No Producing more than they cost Artifact" Policy from wizard ? That's it. You won't ever see Black Lotus anymore. But PEZ wasn't concerned : the dreadful flower is a rare. But Sol ring is not. It's an unco. And it makes 2 colorless at the cost of one. And it's an artifact. So it fitted too well in Affinity.
Turn 1 : Seat of Synod, Sol ring, Ornithopter, Cranial Plating, free Frogmite, free Frogmite.
Hope ? What hope ? Well, it's over. No more Sol ring. The bad thing is, it will actually hurt a lot of decks that could use this fusion thing, but it only proved it was too much of an energy source : the card is so good it could claim at least a slot over any other uncos : everybody needs fast, reliable mana.
The last card still has an uncertain future, as we don't know yet if it will be utterly ban, or simply restricted. The French community - where all this occurs, remind you, all you happy US readers - is strongly fighting for a restriction to a single... SkullClamp. Affinity first used this as its unco, till it realized Sol ring was just better. If you ban Sol Ring, you have to deal with SkullClamp unless you want to downgrade only 2 of the 3 tier 1 decks.
But the sad thing is : what about all the others decks (ElfClamp and KoboldClamp, to mention the best known) that relies on this artefact ?
In order to keep these decks alive, with a lot of change (be prepared to see a lot more of Enlightened tutors), we're trying to push to a simple restriction.
Here are the 2007 PEZ Changes. These are still subject to criticism, experimentation and final validation. But that's the way we're taking here in France. Feel free to comment !
Last reviewed : 17 July 2007
Last reviewed : 21 January 2007
Last reviewed : 25 September 2006
Last reviewed : 16 August 2006
Affinity
Goblin Sligh
White winnie
Stompy
Phantom Cloak
Goblin storm
Elf-ball / Elf-Clamp
Mono black
Psychatog
Tortured existence / Reanimator
Ritual agony
Life
ProsTides
Kobold-Clamp
IsoBurn/Burn
Satin doll
IsoMUC
UG Tempo
Comments
You make an excellent case for change, Frédéric. The PEZ format does appear to have several dominant deck-types. My results, similar to yours, favor Consultation Affinity (rather than Sol Ring), ProsTides and Suicide Black (with Sinkholes and Stripmines).
I guess there are two questions that I have: Are the Paris tournament results a fair representation of all the best decks in the format? And, are your proposed rule changes the best way to solve balance issues?
Addressing the first concern, even within the PEZ Trinity of top-tier decks, I've found that tier-2, and other decks, can win consistently against the top, although not consistently against all three. If we are to accept a PEZ tourament's results as canon, it should include a very wide variety of deck types - and I have not really seen as many decktypes as I would have liked at the Paris tournament (although, it is still probably the best regularly held PEZ tournament internationally).
The basic problem is that we do not yet have enough players to really spread information and develop better decks. Currently, as things stand, you are the best qualified person to make critiques of the format, however.
The second concern is whether or not your proposed rules are apporpriate. Will banning Strip Mine, Sol Ring and Frantic Search really have the impact you desire - or will other decks simply replace these as the top decks?
You make a strong, strong case for change. I'm curious as to what the others might think.
Err... Thanks but these changes are mine to be credited (is that english ?). Christophe Deslandes, aka IdfTrotter, aka French PEZ Master, suggested them all. It came from a lot of tests and tourney results. I gave you the links so you can find by yourself.
Actually, SkullClamp should follow the others 3, as it clearly appears that if we only restrict it, it will need to restrict or ban a handful of tutors (Demonic, Enlightened, Steelshaper's gift... and other I might not think of...). And that would be bad and hard to rule.
Actually, french players - the one I speak with, at last - are quite tired of the current three top tier 1 deck. I can't stand Affinity anymore, for a start. So I DO agree with these changes. Future will tell.
Sorry, I did not mean to imply that you had created these rules - it just appeared that you were in favor of the bans, so I addressed you as if you had created them.
Correction, then: Chris Deslandes makes a really good point. :-) Better?
I have already seen the results from the Paris tournaments and the winners are always top-tier decks. I have a question, though: Skull-clamp decks don't win there (I haven't even seen one place highly), so why would you propose banning it?
SkullCalmp should be ban because it was the unco Affinity used before discovering Sol ring was sooooooooooo good. If you ban Sol ring, it will obviously make a come back. Moreover the card is so broken you can miss it : any consistent ElfClamp or, worse, GoblinClamp (remember Mogg war Marshall) would definitely abuse it to turn on aggro-combo strategies. But the main reason is : it fits too well in Affinity.
We're thinking about banning Cranial Plating too.
Beware, the goal is not utterly destroy the Affinity deck, but to lower it to reasonable ground. Which needs no less than three cards, still letting it quite powerful.
I didn't think Affinity was top tier back when it used Skullclamp. Before it started using Demonic Consultation (or Sol Ring) iIt was not that great because it didn't really have too many creatures that it could clamp. It was almost like wasting uncommon slots.
Right now, there aren't any 'clamp decks that are top tier. Is it because black aggro and untap combo decks pushed them out? I doubt it. There's just too many control decks that destroy clamp decks.
Cranial Plating might be a better ban than Sol Ring, but even then, such a rule might be overdoing things.